Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Lawsuit by Flight Attendants Fired Over Religious Objections to Equality Act Support
A Ninth Circuit ruling allows two former Alaska Airlines employees to proceed with their religious discrimination claims against the airline and their union.
Media·

A federal appeals court has revived a lawsuit initiated by two former flight attendants against Alaska Airlines, asserting they were terminated due to their religious beliefs. The employees had voiced objections to the airline's endorsement of the Equality Act, leading to their dismissal.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling on Wednesday, determining there is adequate evidence for a jury to assess whether Lacey Smith and Marli Brown's dismissals were a direct result of their religious convictions. This decision allows their legal challenge against the airline to move forward.
Background of the Dispute
The controversy originated in early 2021 when Alaska Airlines announced its support for the proposed Equality Act on an internal online platform accessible to employees. The Equality Act, championed by then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, aimed to incorporate sexual orientation and gender identity as protected categories under federal civil rights legislation concerning employment, housing, and other areas. The bill successfully passed the House of Representatives in February 2021.
The airline invited employees to share their thoughts and comments on the online forum. During this discussion, Lacey Smith posted a question asking, "As a company, do you think it’s possible to regulate morality?" Concurrently, Marli Brown submitted a comment articulating her deeply held religious convictions, suggesting that the Equality Act could negatively impact women, girls, and individuals of faith.
Following these remarks on the company's internal forum, both Smith and Brown faced investigations and were subsequently fired from their positions. Alaska Airlines characterized their comments as "discriminatory," "hateful," and "offensive."
Legal Challenge Proceeds
Stephanie Taub, senior counsel at First Liberty Institute, which represents Smith and Brown and argued their case before the court in August 2025, expressed satisfaction with the appellate court's decision.
"We are grateful the court recognized the clear evidence of religious discrimination against Marli and Lacey by both Alaska Airlines and the flight attendants’ union," Taub stated. "The Ninth Circuit’s decision today reinforces that federal civil rights laws protect people of faith from discrimination by their employer or their union. You cannot be fired because your employer does not like your religious beliefs."
The ruling underscores the protection afforded to individuals of faith under federal civil rights statutes, ensuring that employment decisions are not based on an employer's disapproval of an employee's religious beliefs.
Related Stories

Former White House COVID-19 Coordinator Now Believes Pandemic 'Probably a Lab Leak'
Dr. Ashish Jha, the former White House COVID-19 Response Coordinator, has indicated he now believes the virus likely stemmed from a lab leak. This shift in perspective comes after initial skepticism, with Jha citing new
Aug 4

Hasan Piker's Defense of Hamas's 'Right to Resist' Draws Strong Condemnation from Advocacy Groups
Far-left Twitch personality Hasan Piker faced renewed backlash for comments made on CNN defending Hamas's right to military resistance. He dismissed concerns about the group's domestic policies, prompting sharp
Aug 3

Mayor Zohran Mamdani Affirms Demand for ICE Abolition Despite Rapport with President Trump
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani recently detailed his relationship with President Donald Trump, highlighting their shared affection for New York. Despite this rapport, Mamdani remains steadfast in his belief that
Jul 22

Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani Alleges Democratic Party Run by "Well-Paid Consultants and Big Money Interests"
New York State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani recently articulated his view that the Democratic Party is unduly influenced by consultants and wealthy interests. He asserted the party should instead focus on the working
Jul 21